who achieved a sustained response to hepatitis C treatment lowered their risk
of hepatocellular carcinoma by around 70%, regardless of whether they were
treated with new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) or older interferon-based
therapy, according to study results presented at the 2017 AASLD
Liver Meeting
last week in Washington, DC.

doesn’t matter how you eradicate hepatitis C, you get a similar reduction in
liver cancer,” George Ioannou of the University of Washington told reporters at an AASLD press

apparent increase in liver cancer risk seen in some recent studies likely
reflects the fact that people with hepatitis C who have more advanced liver disease
can now be treated in the DAA era, press conference moderator Norah Terrault of
the University of California at San Francisco suggested.

years or decades, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to serious
liver disease including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a type of
primary liver cancer. Successful hepatitis C treatment with interferon is known
to reduce the risk of liver disease progression and liver cancer, and experts
expected the same to be true for the more effective DAAs.

at the 2016 EASL International Liver Congress, Italian researchers reported the first

suggesting that people who achieve sustained virological response (SVR) to DAA
therapy – undetectable HCV RNA at 12 or 24 weeks after finishing treatment – might
be at greater risk for liver cancer, although this
was limited to cancer recurrence in people who’d already had HCC.

In contrast, a study presented at the 2016 Liver Meeting found that treatment with DAAs was not linked to higher HCC risk
in an Italian cohort. And a systematic review and meta-analysis
of more than 40 studies, presented at this year’s International Liver Congress, showed that people treated with DAAs do not appear to have a
higher risk of developing liver cancer than those treated with interferon

To add to
this evidence, Ioannou and colleagues looked at the effect of HCV eradication on
the incidence of HCC in the interferon and DAA eras in the US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. The researchers
only looked at new liver cancer, not HCC recurrence.

The VA is the largest integrated health system providing hepatitis C care in the US.
It has gone from about 174,000 patients with HCV in 2013 to less than 60,000 in
2017 thanks to the advent of DAAs, according to Ioannou. People generally
stay within the system, so it’s possible to track those who receive antiviral treatment
over the many years it takes to develop liver cancer, which cannot be assessed
in the short randomised clinical trials that supported DAA approval.

This retrospective cohort study included 62,354 people
with hepatitis C who underwent treatment with more than 83,000 antiviral
regimens – some were treated more than once. Of these, 35,871 (58%) received
interferon-based regimens without DAAs, 4535 (7%) received interferon plus
early DAAs and 21,948 (35%) used interferon-free DAA regimens. In the latter
group, a majority used sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (Harvoni). Follow-up continued through June 2017 and ranged from 2
to 18 years.

The researchers identified 3271 cases of HCC that were
diagnosed at least 180 days after starting hepatitis C therapy, suggesting they
were not present before treatment. About half of these were in people with

After adjusting for more than 20 factors including
demographics, HCV genotype, HIV or hepatitis B co-infection and liver disease
severity, sustained response to treatment was associated with a 68% decline in
the risk of new HCC among people without cirrhosis and a 50% reduction among those
with cirrhosis.

Achieving SVR was associated with a statistically similar decrease in
liver cancer risk whether people were cured with interferon without DAAs (68%
reduction), interferon plus DAAs (52% reduction) or DAAs only (71% reduction).

of DAAs is not associated with increased HCC risk compared to receipt of interferon,”
the researchers concluded.

liver damage is typically not fully reversible even after HCV is cured, so people
who already have cirrhosis when they undergo treatment remain at ongoing
risk for HCC
. As expected, liver cancer was most
likely to occur among people who both had cirrhosis and were not cured (with an
incidence rate of 3.25 per 100 person-years), followed by those with cirrhosis who
achieved SVR (1.97 per 100 person-years), people without cirrhosis who were not cured (0.87
per 100 person-years) and people with no cirrhosis and SVR (0.24 per 100

limitation of this study is the shorter follow-up period for people treated
with DAAs. Ioannou said he could only speculate about whether the reduction in
HCC incidence after successful DAA treatment would continue, but “we don’t
see any plateauing in the curves.” Over the longer follow-up period for
people successfully treated with interferon, he noted that the risk of HCC gets
lower over time, while the opposite happens for untreated people.

“Eradicating hepatitis C will have a tremendous benefit in reducing
liver cancer in individual patients and in the entire population,” Ioannou
said. “Physicians and patients should not be withholding antiviral
treatment for fear of inducing liver cancer. On the contrary, physicians should
be treating hepatitis C specifically to reduce the risk of liver cancer.”